NOVASMC

GAME DECISION MAP

Com2uS Pro Baseball V26

Sports RPG · Cross-platform · 2022

Current analysisBaseline 2026-07-16Open Decision Analysis → · Korean full analysis

Problem definition

A break between growth resources, time and waiting inputs, team strength and next actions.

View all bottlenecks

Design direction

Connect growth goals, inputs, expected strength changes, actual changes and next choices across three layers.

View all mechanisms
Read the recurring-flow summary

Scout live, season, Impact, Signature, and Golden Glove KBO player cards → build a team deck and lineup → develop players through position training, sponsors, set decks, and major skills → play league, ranking, real-time, home-run, club, and special modes → receive rewards and real-season updates → reinvest into the roster and the next match.

REASONING IN THIS GAME

Selected designs and judgment conditions

Selected principles and the game-local design6 design records

These entries describe the selected design. Design selection is distinct from actual application and effect validation. The classified objects below retain their own roles and connections.

Goals and residual processing

Initial IFR · goal direction

Align exposure, sequence and rules from completion through overall rating or power to the next action.

Final IFR · design goal

Arrange growth completion as a summary, lineup or Set Deck context, and detailed evidence using consistent state grammar.

Recurring Structures

Detailed Repeating Structures

What repeats and keeps the system moving?

3 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Compounding Growth

Compounding Growth

Scout live, season, Impact, Signature, and Golden Glove KBO player cards → build a team deck and lineup → develop players through position training, sponsors, set decks, and major skills → play league, ranking, real-time, home-run, club, and special modes → receive rewards and real-season updates → reinvest into the roster and the next match.

Outputs strengthen assets, capabilities, or access and open a stronger next cycle.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Core Loop: Card → Lineup → Match → Reward → Reinvestment

    This source-declared core loop connects the game's actual repeat sequence.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supply

    Sponsor Exploration → Offline Point Loop

    This source-declared supply loop connects the game's actual repeat sequence.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Acquisition

    Gacha

    This source-declared loop connects the game's actual repeat sequence.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Bottlenecks

Bottleneck Patterns

Where do decisions and flow break?

7 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Resource and Value Conversion Failure

Resource and Value Conversion Failure

The affected flow runs through delta → OVR delta → lineup; its limiting point is the economy commerce settlement handoff.

Currencies, assets, products, or inputs do not convert reliably into utility or residual value.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Economy Commerce

    The affected flow runs through delta → OVR delta → lineup; its limiting point is the economy commerce settlement handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break · Combat Feedback

    The affected flow runs through matching context → lineup delta → opponent power → result view → retry 72h; its limiting point is the combat feedback result handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Economy Commerce

    The affected flow runs through currency gain → balance → compare → spend → residual → next action; its limiting point is the economy commerce settlement handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Rights and Lifecycle Discontinuity · Asset

    The affected flow runs through season 4W old-asset use → inheritance → reinvest → rank recovery → return; its limiting point is the asset lifecycle handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Decision and Planning Calculability Breakdown · Growth Economy

    The affected flow runs through event eligibility → overlap → mission progress → exchange → claim → unclaimed → return interval; its limiting point is the growth economy planning handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Obligation and Volition Erosion · Routine Liveops

    The affected flow runs through session interval → league share → task stack → claim completion → daily completion → return; its limiting point is the routine liveops return handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  7. Supporting

    Outcome and Contribution Attribution Failure · Social

    The affected flow runs through member contribution distribution → role/support → reward → recognition → club return/exit; its limiting point is the social result handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Contradictions

Contradiction Patterns

What must improve, and what must remain protected?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput

Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput

Across OVR, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.

Continuity to the next action, return, or reinvestment must improve while route diversity, strategic depth, and throughput remain protected.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Core Contradiction

    Across OVR, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Economy

    Across source → balance → compare → spend → residual → next-action, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Competition

    Improve Speed Vs Integrity while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    LiveOps

    Across eligibility → claim/unclaimed, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Performance Vs Load.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Routine

    Across switch/claim, improve Performance Vs Load while preserving Stability Vs Volatility.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Club

    Improve Popularity Vs Scarcity while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Mechanisms

Solution Mechanisms

Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across OVR while preserving the protected value.

Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core

    Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across OVR while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding to the source-declared attachment track while preserving its protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across source → balance → compare → spend → residual → next-action while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across eligibility → claim/unclaimed while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across switch/claim while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Context Asset and Authority Isolation · Attachment

    Apply Context Asset and Authority Isolation to the source-declared attachment track while preserving its protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Compositions

Solution Compositions

How should interventions be combined and sequenced?

8 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle

Single-Track Localized Bundle

Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across OVR as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across OVR as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across source → balance → compare → spend → residual → next-action as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across eligibility → claim/unclaimed as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across switch/claim as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Context Asset and Authority Isolation · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  7. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across OVR as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  8. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across OVR as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence