Problem definition
Unclear connections between recovery routes, resource allocation, outcomes and retry after growth stalls.
View all bottlenecksGAME DECISION MAP
Pokémon Masters EX
Design direction
Layer current state and next actions, alternatives and allocation conditions, and evidence and results, retaining growth depth.
View all mechanismsRead the recurring-flow summary
Form a team of Sync Pairs → battle through stages → earn training materials → upgrade Sync Pairs → clear harder events.
REASONING IN THIS GAME
Selected designs and judgment conditions
Goals and residual processing
Initial IFR · goal direction
Create controllable recovery-to-retry continuity while preserving depth.
Final IFR · design goal
Retain depth and allocation while making shortages or defeat, alternatives, growth application, results and retry readable as a deterministic decision flow.
Recurring Structures
Detailed Repeating Structures
What repeats and keeps the system moving?
2 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · External Calendar
External Calendar
Form a team of Sync Pairs → battle through stages → earn training materials → upgrade Sync Pairs → clear harder events.
Events, operating schedules, and live operations reactivate participation, exchange, and reward states.
View pattern definition →Core Core Loop: Collect → Grow → PvE
Sync Pair Scout/acquisition feeds growth, // usage, // currency/shop return, and next acquisition.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supply Trainer Lodge Affinity Loop
Lodge converts owned Sync Pairs into relationship/long-term rewards and Lodge Pair unlock path.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Core classification and definition · Decision and Planning Calculability Breakdown
Decision and Planning Calculability Breakdown
The affected flow runs through route → target/resource → upgrade/use → retry; its limiting point is the growth economy planning handoff.
Multiple goals, resources, states, rules, and paths cannot be compared on one decision surface, forcing repeated reprioritization.
View pattern definition →Core route→target
The affected flow runs through route → target/resource → upgrade/use → retry; its limiting point is the growth economy planning handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Prospect→reference
The affected flow runs through comprehension/reference → attempt/exit/contact/acquire; its limiting point is the asset lifecycle handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting offer
The limiting point sits in the asset lifecycle handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting paid close→free
The affected flow runs through paid close → free/Exchange → residual; its limiting point is the economy commerce settlement handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting result→record
The affected flow runs through result-controlled recognition/expression → return; its limiting point is the combat feedback result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting contribution→recognition→next season
The affected flow runs through contribution → recognition → next season; its limiting point is the social result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Contradictions
Contradiction Patterns
What must improve, and what must remain protected?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput
Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput
Across recovery decision linkage, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Performance Vs Load.
Continuity to the next action, return, or reinvestment must improve while route diversity, strategic depth, and throughput remain protected.
View pattern definition →Core Core Contradiction
Across recovery decision linkage, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Performance Vs Load.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Revenue Vs Trust / None
Across Scout closure interpretability, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Revenue Vs Trust / Complexity Vs Convenience
Across pre/post paid value continuity, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Freedom Vs Control / Popularity Vs Scarcity
Across free/exchange/source-sink continuity, improve Freedom Vs Control while preserving Popularity Vs Scarcity.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Complexity Vs Convenience / Revenue Vs Trust
Across result/recognition/expression visibility, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Revenue Vs Trust.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Performance Vs Load / Stability Vs Volatility
Across contribution/recognition/season continuity, improve Performance Vs Load while preserving Stability Vs Volatility.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Mechanisms
Solution Mechanisms
Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across recovery decision linkage while preserving the protected value.
Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.
View pattern definition →Core Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across recovery decision linkage while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + +
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across Scout closure interpretability while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting +
Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across pre/post paid value continuity while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + +
Apply Baseline and Resource Stabilization across free/exchange/source-sink continuity while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + +
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across result/recognition/expression visibility while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting +
Apply Cadence and Rhythm Coordination across contribution/recognition/season continuity while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Compositions
Solution Compositions
How should interventions be combined and sequenced?
8 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle
Single-Track Localized Bundle
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across recovery decision linkage as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.
View pattern definition →Core Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across recovery decision linkage as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + + Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Scout closure interpretability as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across pre/post paid value continuity as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + + Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across free/exchange/source-sink continuity as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + + Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across result/recognition/expression visibility as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting + Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across contribution/recognition/season continuity as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across recovery decision linkage as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across recovery decision linkage as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence