NOVASMC

GAME DECISION MAP

Mobile Legends: Bang Bang

MOBA · Mobile · 2016

Current analysisBaseline 2026-07-08Open Decision Analysis → · Korean full analysis

Problem definition

Setup, roles, lineups, outcomes and star changes do not clearly lead to personal correction or queue-risk decisions.

View all bottlenecks

Design direction

Layer results, star changes and neutral next actions, observed setup and lineups, and original rules and records.

View all mechanisms
Read the recurring-flow summary

Choose a hero and role → lane, jungle, and team-fight → take objectives, turrets, and the base → receive rank and rewards → adjust the build and queue again.

REASONING IN THIS GAME

Selected designs and judgment conditions

Selected principles and the game-local design6 design records

These entries describe the selected design. Design selection is distinct from actual application and effect validation. The classified objects below retain their own roles and connections.

Goals and residual processing

Initial IFR · goal direction

Use existing setup, result, star and requeue signals to interpret results and the next choice while preserving the grammar of competitive rules.

Final IFR · design goal

Organize the result surface into three layers—result, stars and a neutral next choice; observed context; and canonical rules—and retain consistent adjudication language.

Recurring Structures

Detailed Repeating Structures

What repeats and keeps the system moving?

5 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Compounding Growth

Compounding Growth

Choose a hero and role → lane, jungle, and team-fight → take objectives, turrets, and the base → receive rank and rewards → adjust the build and queue again.

Outputs strengthen assets, capabilities, or access and open a stronger next cycle.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Ranked and Classic Return Loop

    Repeat Ranked and Classic battles, convert performance into competitive standing and social capital, reinvest through account economy and acquisition, then reactivate the next battle through the calendar.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Economy

    Weekly Diamond Pass Claim Loop

    Purchase the Weekly Diamond Pass, receive the immediate Diamonds, claim the seven daily Diamond and resource installments, then return for the next daily claim.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Return

    StarLight Monthly Return Loop

    Enter StarLight for the month, progress both tracks, recover past skins and rare items, receive the immediate resource grant, then return after the monthly reset.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Acquisition

    Limited Draw Acquisition Loop

    Commit Diamonds, Tickets, or Tokens to limited draws, convert progress and duplicate assets into guarantees or exchanges, then choose the next draw or collection target.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Recovery

    Duplicate Asset Exchange Loop

    Convert duplicate skins, heroes, emblems, and event assets into fragments, cores, or tokens, exchange them for a guaranteed asset, then return to collection and participation.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Bottlenecks

Bottleneck Patterns

Where do decisions and flow break?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break

Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break

The limiting point sits in the competition result handoff.

Outcomes, causes, rules, rewards, and retry information do not close the feedback loop needed for correction.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break · Competition

    The limiting point sits in the competition result handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Outcome and Contribution Attribution Failure · Social

    The limiting point sits in the social result handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Transition and Handoff Break · Mastery Growth

    The limiting point sits in the mastery growth return handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Temporal and Operational Synchronization Break · Liveops

    The limiting point sits in the liveops return handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Decision and Planning Calculability Breakdown · Economy Liveops

    The limiting point sits in the economy liveops planning handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Rule and State Fragmentation · Commerce

    The limiting point sits in the commerce entry handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Contradictions

Contradiction Patterns

What must improve, and what must remain protected?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity

Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity

Across setup → role/lineup → result → star → requeue, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

Causes and retry conditions for outcomes, failures, and fairness must become attributable while strategic, combat, and competitive depth and rule integrity remain protected.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Core Contradiction

    Across setup → role/lineup → result → star → requeue, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Complexity Vs Convenience / Freedom Vs Control

    Across party → Squad → mentoring match edge → return, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Popularity Vs Scarcity / Freedom Vs Control

    Across mastery action → milestone/reward → next goal, improve Popularity Vs Scarcity while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Complexity Vs Convenience / Stability Vs Volatility

    Across skip return, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Stability Vs Volatility.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Freedom Vs Control / Popularity Vs Scarcity

    Across source/sink → account maturity → premium entry, improve Freedom Vs Control while preserving Popularity Vs Scarcity.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Revenue Vs Trust / Speed Vs Integrity

    Across pity → exchange expectation receipt/use/abandonment, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Mechanisms

Solution Mechanisms

Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation while preserving the protected value.

Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation

    Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Three-Layer Commerce Contract & Mirrored Receipt

    Apply Context Asset and Authority Isolation across Three-Layer Commerce Contract & Mirrored Receipt while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Maturity-State Free-Action Map

    Apply Baseline and Resource Stabilization across Maturity-State Free-Action Map while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Anchor-First Return Strip

    Apply Route and Return Handoff across Anchor-First Return Strip while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Action–Proof–Next Mastery Spine

    Apply Route and Return Handoff across Action Proof Next Mastery Spine while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Post-Match Relationship Receipt

    Apply Route and Return Handoff across Post-Match Relationship Receipt while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Compositions

Solution Compositions

How should interventions be combined and sequenced?

8 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle

Single-Track Localized Bundle

Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Three-Layer Commerce Contract & Mirrored Receipt Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Three-Layer Commerce Contract & Mirrored Receipt as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Maturity-State Free-Action Map Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Maturity-State Free-Action Map as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Anchor-First Return Strip Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Anchor-First Return Strip as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Action–Proof–Next Mastery Spine Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Action Proof Next Mastery Spine as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Post-Match Relationship Receipt Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Post-Match Relationship Receipt as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  7. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  8. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Three-Layer Post-Match Interpretation as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence