Problem definition
A bottleneck in explaining and crossing growth entry conditions.
View all bottlenecksGAME DECISION MAP
Dungeon & Fighter Mobile
Design direction
Layer current state and one action, alternatives and costs, and rules and sources, preserving manual action, growth depth, values and direct choice.
View all mechanismsRead the recurring-flow summary
Enter a side-scrolling dungeon and fight manually → defeat enemies and bosses for equipment and materials → build the character through gear, skills, and Armory progression → raise Equipment Point and meet upper-content gates → enter raids, party, competition, and advanced farming → reinvest rewards into the next build and dungeon.
REASONING IN THIS GAME
Selected designs and judgment conditions
Selected principles and the game-local design6 design records
These entries describe the selected design. Design selection is distinct from actual application and effect validation. The classified objects below retain their own roles and connections.
Three-layer gate navigator
Route-cost decision layer
Competitive-adjudication tracing layer
Input-response attribution layer
Role and entry-readiness hub
Protection-rule and completion-state contract
Goals and residual processing
Initial IFR · goal direction
Realign rules, sequence and information exposure at gate, feedback and transition points to restore value and trust judgment.
Final IFR · design goal
Rearrange rules, sequence and information exposure at gate, feedback and transition points into three layers so value and trust can be judged.
Recurring Structures
Detailed Repeating Structures
What repeats and keeps the system moving?
2 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Compounding Growth
Compounding Growth
Enter a side-scrolling dungeon and fight manually → defeat enemies and bosses for equipment and materials → build the character through gear, skills, and Armory progression → raise Equipment Point and meet upper-content gates → enter raids, party, competition, and advanced farming → reinvest rewards into the next build and dungeon.
Outputs strengthen assets, capabilities, or access and open a stronger next cycle.
View pattern definition →Core Core Loop: Quest → Battle → Reward → Growth
This source-declared core loop connects the game's actual repeat sequence.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Core Periodic Self-Return · Core
This source-declared core loop connects the game's actual repeat sequence.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Core classification and definition · Access and Qualification Friction
Access and Qualification Friction
The affected flow runs through matched gate sequence; its limiting point is the entry handoff.
Players cannot reliably identify, meet, or sustain the opportunity, qualification, capability, role, or viable path needed to enter.
View pattern definition →Core gate criteria
The affected flow runs through matched gate sequence; its limiting point is the entry handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting path concentration
The affected flow runs through residual after CT controls; its limiting point is the operations pressure handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting match
The affected flow runs through matched graph/conditions; its limiting point is the combat feedback result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting input
The affected flow runs through device/control/job/encounter; its limiting point is the combat feedback result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting role
The affected flow runs through party graph/choke point; its limiting point is the social operations coordination handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting probability
The affected flow runs through lineage + completion cohort; its limiting point is the asset lifecycle handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Contradictions
Contradiction Patterns
What must improve, and what must remain protected?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput
Action and Return Continuity vs System Depth and Throughput
Across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
Continuity to the next action, return, or reinvestment must improve while route diversity, strategic depth, and throughput remain protected.
View pattern definition →Core Core Contradiction
Across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Freedom Vs Control / Performance Vs Load
Across time/click cost, improve Freedom Vs Control while preserving Performance Vs Load.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Freedom Vs Control / None
Across match condition → result → reward re-entry continuity, improve Freedom Vs Control while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Complexity Vs Convenience / None
Across input-feedback continuity, fail/retry/clear , device/control, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Complexity Vs Convenience / None
Across phase formation → clear, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Popularity Vs Scarcity / Revenue Vs Trust
Across completion → ownership state, improve Popularity Vs Scarcity while preserving Revenue Vs Trust.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Mechanisms
Solution Mechanisms
Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback while preserving the protected value.
Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.
View pattern definition →Core Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Route and Return Handoff · Attachment
Apply Route and Return Handoff across time/click cost while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across match condition → result → reward re-entry continuity while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across input-feedback continuity, fail/retry/clear , device/control while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Context Asset and Authority Isolation · Attachment
Apply Context Asset and Authority Isolation across phase formation → clear while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across completion → ownership state while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Compositions
Solution Compositions
How should interventions be combined and sequenced?
8 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle
Single-Track Localized Bundle
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.
View pattern definition →Core Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Core Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Route and Return Handoff · Attachment Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across time/click cost as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across match condition → result → reward re-entry continuity as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across input-feedback continuity, fail/retry/clear , device/control as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Context Asset and Authority Isolation · Attachment Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across phase formation → clear as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across completion → ownership state as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across gate/next-step , , entry/failure feedback as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence