NOVASMC

GAME DECISION MAP

Zenless Zone Zero

Action RPG · Cross-platform · 2024

Current analysisBaseline 2026-06-13Open Decision Analysis → · Korean full analysis

Problem definition

A visibility gap in attributing combat outcomes and asset contributions.

View all bottlenecks

Design direction

Separate decisions, evidence and on-demand traces to show observed facts, comparison signals, unknowns and next checks.

View all mechanisms
Read the recurring-flow summary

Select a Main Story, Commission, farming, event, or endgame objective in New Eridu → assemble Agents, W-Engines, Drive Discs, Bangboo, and a combat plan → enter 3D exploration or instanced action → use swaps, Assist, Dodge, Daze, Stun, Anomaly, and Chain Attack to resolve combat → receive Battery-based materials, Denny, Signals, rewards, scores, and roster progress → level and configure Agents, skills, Core Skills, W-Engines, Drive Discs, and teams → compare free, exchange, Channel, Shop, cadence, and next-version paths → return to the next objective.

REASONING IN THIS GAME

Selected designs and judgment conditions

Selected principles and the game-local design6 design records

These entries describe the selected design. Design selection is distinct from actual application and effect validation. The classified objects below retain their own roles and connections.

Goals and residual processing

Initial IFR · goal direction

Realign exposure, sequence, rules and information structure for results, causes and next actions.

Recurring Structures

Detailed Repeating Structures

What repeats and keeps the system moving?

5 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Resource Conversion

Resource Conversion

Select a Main Story, Commission, farming, event, or endgame objective in New Eridu → assemble Agents, W-Engines, Drive Discs, Bangboo, and a combat plan → enter 3D exploration or instanced action → use swaps, Assist, Dodge, Daze, Stun, Anomaly, and Chain Attack to resolve combat → receive Battery-based materials, Denny, Signals, rewards, scores, and roster progress → level and configure Agents, skills, Core Skills, W-Engines, Drive Discs, and teams → compare free, exchange, Channel, Shop, cadence, and next-version paths → return to the next objective.

Currencies, duplicate assets, rights, or exchange outputs become inputs or qualifications for the next cycle.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Weekly Session Loop

    The actual loop runs through Notorious Hunt → Hollow Zero → Ridu Weekly → Outpost/Intel Board → City Fund.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Core

    Biweekly Validation Loop

    The actual loop runs through Shiyu Defense Deadly Assault.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Acquisition

    Commercial Feedback Loop

    The actual loop runs through Story → Character Exposure → Signal Search → Agent/W-Engine → PvE.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Economy

    Daily Session Loop

    The actual loop runs through Errands/Coffee → Battery → Trust/Temple/Video Store → Event/Story.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Return

    Version Session Loop

    The actual loop runs through Story → Agent → Flagship Event → Endgame Rotation → Phase II → Finale.

    Evidence
    Source Described
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Bottlenecks

Bottleneck Patterns

Where do decisions and flow break?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break

Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break

The limiting point sits in the combat feedback result handoff.

Outcomes, causes, rules, rewards, and retry information do not close the feedback loop needed for correction.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break · Combat Feedback

    The limiting point sits in the combat feedback result handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Rights and Lifecycle Discontinuity · Asset

    The limiting point sits in the asset lifecycle handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Rights and Lifecycle Discontinuity · Asset

    The limiting point sits in the asset lifecycle handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Economy Commerce

    The limiting point sits in the economy commerce settlement handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Obligation and Volition Erosion · Routine Liveops

    The limiting point sits in the routine liveops return handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Economy Commerce

    The limiting point sits in the economy commerce settlement handoff.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Contradictions

Contradiction Patterns

What must improve, and what must remain protected?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity

Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity

Across result → cause → next-action attribution discriminability, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

Causes and retry conditions for outcomes, failures, and fairness must become attributable while strategic, combat, and competitive depth and rule integrity remain protected.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Core Contradiction

    Across result → cause → next-action attribution discriminability, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    Stability Vs Volatility / Complexity Vs Convenience

    Across mode-specific objective/action/roster distinction and circulation vitality, improve Stability Vs Volatility while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Performance Vs Load / Complexity Vs Convenience

    Across acquisition-to- flow and state legibility, improve Performance Vs Load while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Freedom Vs Control / Stability Vs Volatility

    Across voluntary session allocation, exit, and return, improve Freedom Vs Control while preserving Stability Vs Volatility.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Revenue Vs Trust / Complexity Vs Convenience

    Across coherent commerce comparison and informed choice, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Complexity Vs Convenience / Revenue Vs Trust

    Across distinguishable owned/complete/usable contract, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Revenue Vs Trust.

    Evidence
    Classification Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Mechanisms

Solution Mechanisms

Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?

6 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Layered and Progressive Disclosure

Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge while preserving the protected value.

Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge

    Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    First-Use Readiness Contract

    Apply Baseline and Resource Stabilization across First-Use Readiness Contract while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Ownership Completion & Preserved-Value Contract

    Apply Context Asset and Authority Isolation across Ownership Completion & Preserved-Value Contract while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Mode Identity & Circulation Contract

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across Mode Identity & Circulation Contract while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Session Choice & Return Contract

    Apply Route and Return Handoff across Session Choice & Return Contract while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Commerce Decision Grammar Contract

    Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across Commerce Decision Grammar Contract while preserving the protected value.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence

Solution Compositions

Solution Compositions

How should interventions be combined and sequenced?

8 analysis items · Read the method

Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle

Single-Track Localized Bundle

Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  2. Supporting

    First-Use Readiness Contract Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across First-Use Readiness Contract as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  3. Supporting

    Ownership Completion & Preserved-Value Contract Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Ownership Completion & Preserved-Value Contract as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  4. Supporting

    Mode Identity & Circulation Contract Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Mode Identity & Circulation Contract as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  5. Supporting

    Session Choice & Return Contract Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Session Choice & Return Contract as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  6. Supporting

    Commerce Decision Grammar Contract Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Commerce Decision Grammar Contract as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  7. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence
  8. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Three-Layer Contribution Decision Bridge as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.

    Evidence
    Solution Link Confirmed
    Outcome basis
    Design Evidence