Problem definition
A break between result attribution, causal learning and the next decision.
View all bottlenecksGAME DECISION MAP
Teamfight Tactics Mobile
Design direction
Build a layered bridge from results to plans, safeguarding strategic depth, legitimate variance, fair comparison and rating privacy.
View all mechanismsRead the recurring-flow summary
Enter an eight-player match on an equal session reset → use Gold, Shop, XP, Traits, Items, Augments, positioning, and scouting during planning → watch automatic combat resolve → receive placement and Ranked Tier / LP results → advance Star Atlas, Pass, rank, and cosmetic account value → reinterpret the result and choose the next composition, economy plan, mode, goal, or acquisition path.
REASONING IN THIS GAME
Selected designs and judgment conditions
Selected principles and the game-local design6 design records
These entries describe the selected design. Design selection is distinct from actual application and effect validation. The classified objects below retain their own roles and connections.
Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge
Set Re-entry Mastery Bridge
Action-Ready Planning Bridge
Choice-Preserving Goal Closure Card
Non-Coercive Pass End-State Assurance
Sourced Acquisition Cost-Path Assurance
Goals and residual processing
Initial IFR · goal direction
Connect results, factors, learning and actions at the factor-interpretation junction while retaining outcome uncertainty, multiple choices and matchmaking-information boundaries.
Final IFR · design goal
Make sourced result interpretation progressively legible at existing post-result junctions, connecting it to multiple player-chosen corrective actions and replanning routes.
Recurring Structures
Detailed Repeating Structures
What repeats and keeps the system moving?
7 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Resource Conversion
Resource Conversion
Enter an eight-player match on an equal session reset → use Gold, Shop, XP, Traits, Items, Augments, positioning, and scouting during planning → watch automatic combat resolve → receive placement and Ranked Tier / LP results → advance Star Atlas, Pass, rank, and cosmetic account value → reinterpret the result and choose the next composition, economy plan, mode, goal, or acquisition path.
Currencies, duplicate assets, rights, or exchange outputs become inputs or qualifications for the next cycle.
View pattern definition →Core Set Renewal Loop
Set rotation replaces roster/traits/mechanic/theme while preserving account identity and cosmetic inventory.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Core Peripheral Exploration Loop
Players move from core to Double Up, Tocker, Choncc or limited modes and back through shared grammar and progress.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Economy Core Match Loop
Queue → shop/economy → unit/trait/item/augment decisions → positioning → auto combat → HP/placement → next match.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Competition Ranked Mastery Loop
Placement updates LP/MMR/Tier; rank and mastery objectives drive repeat play across the set.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Economy Progression Loop
Play, trait use and placement feed Pass/Star Atlas, which unlock cosmetic and currency rewards.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Economy Commerce Loop
Playtime exposes cosmetics; Pass, bundles, Treasure and Rotating Shop convert identity demand into non-power purchases.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Return LiveOps Loop
Patch and mid-patch observe meta, tune traits/champions/augments/modes, fix bugs and restart exploration.
- Evidence
- Source Described
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Core classification and definition · Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break
Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break
The limiting point sits in the competition mastery result handoff.
Outcomes, causes, rules, rewards, and retry information do not close the feedback loop needed for correction.
View pattern definition →Core Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break · Competition Mastery
The limiting point sits in the competition mastery result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Transition and Handoff Break · Season Mastery
The limiting point sits in the season mastery return handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Technical Performance and Compatibility Break · Device Runtime Competition
The limiting point sits in the device runtime competition handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Transition and Handoff Break · Goal Reward
The limiting point sits in the goal reward result handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Temporal and Operational Synchronization Break · Liveops Pass
The limiting point sits in the liveops pass return handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Commerce
The limiting point sits in the commerce entry handoff.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Contradictions
Contradiction Patterns
What must improve, and what must remain protected?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity
Outcome and Failure Attribution vs System Depth and Rule Integrity
Across LP → decision factor , , corrective action/replan closure, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
Causes and retry conditions for outcomes, failures, and fairness must become attributable while strategic, combat, and competitive depth and rule integrity remain protected.
View pattern definition →Core Core Contradiction
Across LP → decision factor , , corrective action/replan closure, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Set Mastery Portability
Across Set Set first valid mastery action first-10-game learning mastery portability, improve Stability Vs Volatility while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Mobile Planning Opportunity
Across decision time shop → information → input action planning opportunity, improve Performance Vs Load while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Goal-to-Action
Across goal exposure next action → claim → use earned-value closure, improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Pass Time-Value Choice Closure
Across remaining time → level → value buy-or- claim/use time-value choice closure, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Acquisition Cost-Path Closure
Across total cost pull/exchange equip acquisition cost-path closure, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving None.
- Evidence
- Classification Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Mechanisms
Solution Mechanisms
Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?
6 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Layered and Progressive Disclosure
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge while preserving the protected value.
Separate complex meaning, rules, and strategy into layers and reveal only the depth needed at each moment.
View pattern definition →Core Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge
Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Set Re-entry Mastery Bridge
Apply Route and Return Handoff across Set Re-entry Mastery Bridge while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Action- Planning Bridge
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across Action- Planning Bridge while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Choice-Preserving Goal Closure Card
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across Choice-Preserving Goal Closure Card while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Non-Coercive Pass End-State Assurance
Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across Non-Coercive Pass End-State Assurance while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Sourced Acquisition Cost-Path Assurance
Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across Sourced Acquisition Cost-Path Assurance while preserving the protected value.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Solution Compositions
Solution Compositions
How should interventions be combined and sequenced?
8 analysis items · Read the method
Core classification and definition · Single-Track Localized Bundle
Single-Track Localized Bundle
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.
View pattern definition →Core Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Set Re-entry Mastery Bridge Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Set Re-entry Mastery Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Action- Planning Bridge Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Action- Planning Bridge as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Choice-Preserving Goal Closure Card Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Choice-Preserving Goal Closure Card as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Non-Coercive Pass End-State Assurance Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Non-Coercive Pass End-State Assurance as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Sourced Acquisition Cost-Path Assurance Composition
Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across Sourced Acquisition Cost-Path Assurance as Single-Track Localized Bundle.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence
Supporting Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition
Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across Layered Result-to-Plan Bridge as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.
- Evidence
- Solution Link Confirmed
- Outcome basis
- Design Evidence