NOVASMC

GAME DECISION MAP

Pokémon Sleep

Sleep Tracking · Mobile · 2023

Current analysisBaseline 2026-06-26Open Decision Analysis →

Record sleep → conduct morning sleep research → befriend helper Pokémon → feed and raise Snorlax → prepare for the next sleep session.

Recurring Structures

Detailed Repeating Structures

What repeats and keeps the system moving?

CORE CLASSIFICATION

Compounding Growth

Record sleep → conduct morning sleep research → befriend helper Pokémon → feed and raise Snorlax → prepare for the next sleep session.

Outputs strengthen assets, capabilities, or access and open a stronger next cycle.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Night–Morning–Afternoon Core Loop

    Night sleep → morning research/befriending → daytime feeding/cooking → next night expectation.

  2. Competition

    Weekly Snorlax Reset Loop

    Monday region/Snorlax reset creates weekly arc from Basic to Master ranks.

Bottlenecks

Bottleneck Patterns

Where do decisions and flow break?

CORE CLASSIFICATION

Resource and Value Conversion Failure

The affected flow runs through 56 90d/cap shortage → route → reinvestment → outcome; its limiting point is the growth economy reinvestment handoff.

Currencies, assets, products, or inputs do not convert reliably into utility or residual value.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Growth Economy

    The affected flow runs through 56 90d/cap shortage → route → reinvestment → outcome; its limiting point is the growth economy reinvestment handoff.

  2. Supporting

    Legibility and Interpretation Break · Wellness Growth

    The affected flow runs through device/input cohort validity → correction → research → return; its limiting point is the wellness growth result handoff.

  3. Supporting

    Action Feedback and Failure Attribution Break · Wellness Mastery

    The affected flow runs through valid/invalid inputs → result → explanation → continuation; its limiting point is the wellness mastery result handoff.

  4. Supporting

    Resource and Value Conversion Failure · Commerce Growth

    The affected flow runs through offer → state → use → return/renewal; its limiting point is the commerce growth settlement handoff.

  5. Supporting

    Fairness and Legitimacy Erosion · Event Liveops

    The affected flow runs through formula → participation → result/claim → return; its limiting point is the event liveops result handoff.

  6. Supporting

    Outcome and Contribution Attribution Failure · Community Cooperation

    The affected flow runs through active relation → utility → return; its limiting point is the community cooperation result handoff.

Contradictions

Contradiction Patterns

What must improve, and what must remain protected?

CORE CLASSIFICATION

Asset and Economy Grammar Legibility vs Structural Diversity and Control

Across source/sink, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

The roles, inflows, outflows, states, and uses of assets and currencies must become legible while diversity, reuse value, and economic control remain protected.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Core Contradiction

    Across source/sink, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Freedom Vs Control.

  2. Supporting

    Sleep Input Validity & Recognition Contract

    Across validity → recognition → correction → research-generation, improve Speed Vs Integrity while preserving None.

  3. Supporting

    Morning Result Formula Reliability

    Improve Complexity Vs Convenience while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

  4. Supporting

    Commerce Contract-to-Post-Purchase Value

    Across entitlement, improve Revenue Vs Trust while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

  5. Supporting

    Event Formula & Participation Meaning

    Across event type → claim → post-event return, improve Stability Vs Volatility while preserving Speed Vs Integrity.

  6. Supporting

    Research Community Utility & Reciprocity

    Across relation → report/Candy/closeness → reciprocity → reuse/return, improve Performance Vs Load while preserving Complexity Vs Convenience.

Solution Mechanisms

Solution Mechanisms

Which intervention mechanism changes the condition?

CORE CLASSIFICATION

Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer

Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across source/sink while preserving the protected value.

Buffer loss, regret, probability, completion, and purchase-right risk while preserving existing value and voluntary choice.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer · Core

    Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across source/sink while preserving the protected value.

  2. Supporting

    Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Attachment

    Apply Layered and Progressive Disclosure across validity → recognition → correction → research-generation while preserving the protected value.

  3. Supporting

    + +

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding to the source-declared attachment track while preserving its protected value.

  4. Supporting

    + +

    Apply Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer across entitlement while preserving the protected value.

  5. Supporting

    + +

    Apply Cadence and Rhythm Coordination across event type → claim → post-event return while preserving the protected value.

  6. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment

    Apply State and Rule Visibility Encoding across relation → report/Candy/closeness → reciprocity → reuse/return while preserving the protected value.

Solution Compositions

Solution Compositions

How should interventions be combined and sequenced?

CORE CLASSIFICATION

Single-Track Localized Bundle

Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across source/sink as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

Combine a core intervention with stabilizing or accelerating support within one problem track and keep its impact localized.

View pattern definition →
  1. Core

    Loss Trust and Entitlement Buffer · Core Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across source/sink as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  2. Supporting

    Layered and Progressive Disclosure · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across validity → recognition → correction → research-generation as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  3. Supporting

    + + Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  4. Supporting

    + + Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across entitlement as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  5. Supporting

    + + Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across event type → claim → post-event return as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  6. Supporting

    State and Rule Visibility Encoding · Attachment Composition

    Connect 1 source-declared mechanism across relation → report/Candy/closeness → reciprocity → reuse/return as Single-Track Localized Bundle.

  7. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across source/sink as Core-First Branch-Sequential Portfolio.

  8. Supporting

    Parallel Solution-Mechanism Composition

    Connect 6 source-declared mechanisms across source/sink as Parallel Local Contracts with Independent Rollback.